Facebook Purge Removed 559 Pages, 251 Accounts Ahead of US Elections

facebook, inauthentic behavior, midterm elections, social media, Fake news

This article by LMWYT  was originally published at WasteYourTime.CO on October 12th, 2018. It is being republished here with the publisher’s permission through syndication.

“Today, we’re removing 559 pages and 251 accounts that have consistently broken our rules against spam and coordinated inauthentic behavior,” announced Facebook’s Nathaniel Gleicher, Head of Cybersecurity Policy, and Oscar Rodriguez, Product Manager, on October 12th.

Actual, Facebook purged over 800 U.S. accounts and pages for pushing political spam. It is another decision to clean the world’s largest social media site of allegedly inaccurate and manipulative political speech.

The post explains that some users were using multiple accounts with the same name, or fraudulent accounts under fake names, and cross-promoting between groups to amplify its spread.

“Many were using fake accounts or multiple accounts with the same names and posted massive amounts of content across a network of Groups and Pages to drive traffic to their websites. Many used the same techniques to make their content appear more popular on Facebook than it really was. Others were ad farms using Facebook to mislead people into thinking that they were forums for legitimate political debate.”

These removals might be a final catalyst for mass adoption of an on-chain, censorship-resistant platform, for instance, within the Bitcoin Cash network.

Facebook’s blog titled the entry of Oct. 11, 2018, “Removing Additional Inauthentic Activity from Facebook,” which leads readers to believe pages and accounts deleted were associated with a version of fraud or scam activity.

Facebook insisted, “People need to be able to trust the connections they make on Facebook. It’s why we have a policy banning coordinated inauthentic behavior — networks of accounts or pages working to mislead others about who they are, and what they are doing,” and added that “the bulk of the inauthentic activity we see on Facebook is spam that’s typically motivated by money, not politics.”

It looks something more sinister is going on did an examination, and found that  “a significant number of the pages zapped from existence did not engage in any of the activities Facebook cited as the reason for the purge.” Political pages such as The Psychologic-Anarchist, Free Thought Project, V is for Voluntary, Press For Truth, The Resistance, Reasonable People Unite, Reverb Press, Nation in Distress, Snowflakes, were caught up in the web of deletion as well, reveals The selections were characterized as being variously dedicated to right and left-wing views.

Another question is how many followers these pages had. The New York Times says that deleted pages Right Wing News, a conservative outlet, had 3.1 million followers. Reverb Press, a left-wing outlet, had 816,000 followers. Facebook told that it would not be releasing the follower counts. Facebook’s spokesperson said page admins and users were notified.

Facebook is a private company with the right to set its own rules, but targeting American-run accounts and pages will naturally spark a new controversy about freedom of speech. Everyone is understandably upset.

“This definitely seems politically motivated considering most of the pages I’m familiar with that were unpublished leaned libertarian or anarchist,” detailed Nicholas Bernabe, the founder of popular alternative news organization The Anti-Media. “With the midterm elections so close, this can be described as nothing other than Facebook trying to manipulate the outcome of the coming elections.”

Certain pages were taken down on purpose. “All of this is nothing more to me than a neo-Marxist cleanse if you will,” said Luis Fernando Borges Mises for, “…all the liberal pages are still there, all the Republican pages are still there. The ones that are trying to question the status quo, like the voluntaryist pages, are being censored and deleted.”

So, what is behind this Facebook’s action?

In its Thursday announcement, Facebook wrote it was taking this action because “people will only share on Facebook if they feel safe and trust the connections they make here.” It’s a good point.

Facebook for years has tried to squeeze spam and clickbait from its platform because it can irritate users. But Facebook has usually applied a softer punishment, downranking the sites in its newsfeed so fewer people see them – but not shutting them down altogether. Since Russian operatives used Facebook to target American voters ahead of the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the company tries to demonstrate that its platform won’t be used to disrupt the democratic process.

“It is totally reasonable for companies to say if you abuse our mechanisms, we will punish you, even if the individual content is okay,” said Alex Stamos, who resigned as Facebook’s chief security officer this summer and is now an adjunct professor at the Center for International Security and Cooperation at Stanford University and a Hoover Fellow. “Facebook first reduced the ability to use ads to punish extreme content. Now they are attacking organic recommendation systems, such as the likes and shares used to artificially inflate posts.”

But, is there something else?

One is left wondering, is Facebook that authority which can decide what constitutes legitimate political expression, to begin with.

Comment from the editor at

In light of the upcoming midterm elections in the U.S. and during these contentious times, we thought this article was worth a second look. Free speech and a free press are under the microscope these days. Some say they are under attack. With today’s technology and social media its hard to distinguish between what is real or fake. The sheer volume of data coming at us 24/7 can be overwhelming. If someone is giving their point of view on a soapbox or standing at a lectern or speaking on TV or being quoted in an article it is not the same as massive, anonymous, clandestine efforts to manipulate public opinion at any cost with fake information from dubious sources. Was Facebook right in taking this action? I think so. We have the right to speak anything we like in this country, but we don’t have the right to say it anywhere we like. Facebook is a platform as is the New York Times or FOX News or CNN who have the right to decide who is heard on their platform. If these platforms feel certain content is inappropriate for their audience, they have the right to make those decisions. Most major news organizations still look for the truth, check the facts, their sources and they are mindful of the ethics related to what they do. This is why they are major news organizations. The best deliver the facts and let the public develop their own opinions. In today’s reality, we have alternate truths, outright lies, and mischaracterizations thrown at us daily with the intent of manipulating public opinion. If the alt-right or the far left or foreign players want to spread their version of truth they are free to do so, on their own platforms! Using social media sites to spread fake news, division, and hate should be unacceptable. I wouldn’t allow it on this site and I support Facebook and any other platform that cares enough about its audience to purge what it finds to be untrue, inappropriate or offensive from their sites.



Previous ArticleNext Article